I may be missing something, but it looks like only 2 of the top 10 young economists ranked by RePEc are doing what might be considered broadly micro research. The other 8 do either macro or trade.
Is this a sign that research in macro and trade is advancing quickly, and so is more popular? I doubt it. In fact, I suspect the opposite. Because of stagnation in these fields, good work is probably more likely to be centralized in a few researchers who dominate the citations.
Or, perhaps this is a sign of the popularity of "big" issues. Micro studies probably don't capture as much of the imagination as macro issues, especially now.
HT to MR
Monday, March 30, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment