
The problem of being land locked has been on my mind a lot since finishing Paul Collier's new book, The Bottom Billion. I was nervous about reading the book at first since I am familiar with Collier's work and do not like the loose causal arguments he often makes, but the book held together well.
Cell phone coverage obviously does not mean these countries are doing well, but it does suggest they have something that will help them considerably in the future. Is this map evidence that, despite years of conflict in these 3 countries, the quality of neighboring countries really do matter, as Collier suggests? Or is it that each is run by a despotic, but brilliant, leader? Or does a lush, well developed landscape somehow matter?
Oh, and my second favorite map is the linguistic division of Sub-Saharan Africa:

No comments:
Post a Comment